Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Bombthecat's commentslogin

Going through this with a medical startup... We have like 2 developer. But to get investment, put the app online etc. We need to fill out those paperwork... For things which just don't exist...

Isn't the point of the paperwork to get you to make those things exist?

> We need to fill out those paperwork... For things which just don't exist...

Things like what? HIPAA?


Yeah, including weird teas, minerals, oils etc etc.

Source: my wife, every YouTube video was with something new which "totally" change your odds. Pinky promise.

God, how I hate those people.


The "try anything to help" argument drives me batty. How do you know acupuncture doesn't hurt your odds? For every quack treatment somebody is trying to sell you, we could come up with a million other quack treatments (rub cat fur in your eyes twice daily to improve ovulation) that you're not trying. Random unproven nonsense is as likely to hurt as it is to help. Actually, given that it's so much easier to disrupt systems than it is to improve them, random unproven nonsense is far more likely to hurt than it is to help.

Yeah, they are preying on people who a vulnerable and going through a difficult phase...

And always this sentence: I know someone who this worked with! You can always find someone where something "worked". Started smoking? Bet you find someone where it worked.. started drinking alcohol? Bet you find someone where it worked... Etc.

Mfer.

Excuse my English


We know AI will be pushed through. No matter the laws

what I keep wondering is what kind of laws will be rendered useless with the precedent they'll cause. Can this be beginning of the end of copyright and intellectual property?

Copyright, possibly. Intellectual property more broadly, no. AI has 0 impact on trademark law, quite clearly (which is anchored in consumer protection, in principle). Patent law is perhaps more related, but it's still pretty far.

In a way, I think so. Just let the code recreate existing code, say it's AI code and doesn't break any copyright laws

Doubt it. I'm sure it will have an exclusion where for example using genAI to train on or replicate leaked or reverse-engineered Windows code will constitute copyright infringement, but doing the same for copyleft will be allowed. Always in favor of corporate interests.

Why are you wondering? Any law that limits the ability of capital owners to extract wealth will be overturned, and not just from AI, that's global in every industry everywhere there are humans.

My trip from USA to Amsterdam doesn't have starlink, at all. Not a single plane. No matter the company.

So sad


Spies, at the end of the day they are spies.

Meh, I feel like we are in the "cloud is bad phase" all over again.

Companies will use US ai models without issues in a few years.


The companies I work want onprem models, and no Chinese ones. Does mistral support onprem? ( For a price)

And then we all go on trades and uhhh no one will be able pay for it lol

You could use the learning mode for that!

Badabum tas :)


Everyone is just hoping, that in five years, when new seniors are needed, that eastern people are seniors by then and cheaper or that ai can replace them.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: