> because AI can trivially be told to imitate that

lowercase, maybe, but not em dashes.

You may want to take a look at the source and code sample #2 in the post - the site CSS is rendering em dashes in the source with 2 hyphens by using a custom font. Admittedly it's not the most portable solution, but speaks to (what I take as) one of the post's points that there's not a single, easy shibboleth for identifying AI writing

Yes, at the very least, it's a no-brainer for OS maintainers who are already paying for Max 20x.

You missed the sarcasm.

Lol, I did. Needed a /s!

> Everyone says that but I don't see anyone cooking up the next photoshop and selling it at $3/month.

Yup, same reason you can't throw manpower at a software project and expect a proportional outcome (Brooks's Law). AI amplifies what's already there; it doesn't conjure taste or product vision out of thin air.

Yeah to me, Burst+Jobs and Compute shaders are so easy to work with in Unity, I haven't felt the need to squeeze more perf out of C# in a long time.

For modding and OTA stuff I just use a scripting language with good interop (I made OneJS partially for this purpose). No more AOT issue and no more waiting for domain reload, etc.

Yes and it works well IME. https://docs.unity3d.com/6000.3/Documentation/Manual/roslyn-...

Now I think about it, writing SourceGenerators is actually a great fit for AI agents.

Wow that's less than a month ago. I wonder if this kind of stuff is picking up steam.

> Rivlin told me that the bogus customer service number and the impostor representative were believable.

My wife said it was the persistent CC# inquiry combined with the heavy Indian accent that put her on alert.

Yes what the hell is wrong with this title. Where on the pricing page does it say the Industry plan require a runtime fee?

It doesn't. It mentions their runtime because that's what they licence out on all their plans. This way you can maintain ownership of your projects assets and code, the runtime is what they licence and in the industry case, they charge 4% of earnings. Which is 20% less than what Epic charges for Unreal.

Yup, I agree with the author 100%. By far the worst part of AI code generation is the inability to discern old and deprecated APIs/syntax/workflows of tech stacks that are constantly changing.

As someone who maintains multiple JS libs and provides support on Discord, the #1 reason I default to using TW is because it lets me drop code snippets in chat without lugging around an extra CSS file or walls of inline styles, keeping everything compact and easy to read (tons of vertical space saved).

Example: https://onejs.com/docs/web/tailwind#quick-example

Without TW, that snippet may need to take 3x more lines.

---

My major issue with TW at the moment is that I use TW in a non-browser environment (Unity), so TW3 is fine since I can tweak everything with JavaScript. TW4 shifts everything to CSS, gives zero workarounds, and my setup crumbles.