Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MiddleEndian's commentslogin

One of the straight-up benefits of TV gaming that Bazzite (and presumably any KDE environment, but it's been a bit since I used another) has over Windows is that you can label your Bluetooth devices. I have blue controller, pink controller, white controller, damaged white controller. 90% of my gaming is local multiplayer games and I switch between an actual PS5 and PC, so this is super useful.

Can't do it in Windows 11 for some reason. No option to label them in the new settings app and the option to label them in the old control panel does not work. They all got saved as "Dualsense Controller" and you just had to guess which one you were reconnecting.


I agree that development sometimes takes extra steps, but honestly setting up dev environments almost always takes too many steps anyway lol. Overall it's worth it for the stability.

Yeah I have a Surface Laptop Studio. Windows 11 is generally awful to the point where I have switched to Bazzite for my desktop, but the form factor with touch support (and pen support) is great. Easel mode is great for drawing, tablet mode is pretty good for drawing as well and also for casual browsing or for displaying DND character sheet info. Even in laptop mode sometimes I find myself using it to scroll a bit on pages.

Or even non-software tickets at large corporations. I reported a water dispenser filling too slowly at my office because it took me a few tries just to fill my 1L water bottle. They said it was fixed and closed it.

It was not fixed. So I took a video of myself refilling my water bottle, attached it to the ticket, and re-opened it. They actually fixed it after that. The video was 2m12s long (and I spent god knows how long making the video file small enough to attach to the ticket lol)


this is actually a good example of how a more detailed issue will have a higher chance to be addressed. I don't know what information that's your previous report is lacking, but the video certainly give more information that the maintainer can pinpoint the cause and act on it. The ability to pinpoint the cause from the report is a godsent for maintainers, it drastically reduce the time to investigate the cause, thus able to act immediately.

Some of the information in this can may be:

* how "slow" exactly the process is related with normal behavior. If it's just said "slow" on previous report, it's easy to be dismissed

* the dispenser's behavior, such as if the water flow is consistently low volume or clogged intermittently, or if the dispenser is struggling to fetch from water source, etc


I'd say it was both. I gave a pretty detailed explanation before, far more detailed than my post here, including a timeline of when it filled in one shot, then two shots, and then three or four (can't remember). I doubt they actually checked before the video. But I was very motivated to fix the issue so I gave them proof lol

More importantly it shows how the reporter actually used the system to trigger the undesired behavior. Just because something is obvious to you doesn't mean it will be obvious to whoever is looking at the bug report.

You can have both. Bazzite Linux lets you sandbox applications and also control your own device.

>walled garden

Makes sense to me. Ideally, people outside of my friends and family would not be able to call me on my regular phone either.


You don't want to be able to communicate with your doctor, kid's teacher, someone who is coming to repair your home, a neighbor who just moved in, etc.?

Eh they can be added to my contacts and then fall under "friend" I guess lol

Pretty sweet. Do you have it hosted anywhere? Seems github doesn't want to let you load HTML directly (for obvious reasons lol)

Not mine, I'll keep this limitation in mind when I redo my personal site and add it in so it's easy to remember (for me at least ;)

Now they just need a third party who's never seen the original to rewrite their TypeScript solution in Rust for even more gains.


Indeed! But only after a year or so of using it in production, so that the drawbacks would be discovered.


I'm not much of a gambler, but I bet on an MMA match once when I was in Vegas. I was informed that the payouts (or lack thereof) were determined by whatever the judges stated at the end of the night, even if the call was controversial and later invalidated. So this sort of thing does affect other forms of gambling, although obviously on a less significant scale.


Interesting. What would happen if it was found later that the match was thrown on purpose by either the judges or the fighters?

This sort of suggests that the best trading strategy would be if you had a guy inside of the censorship bureau who could help you define reality as you want it.


>Interesting. What would happen if it was found later that the match was thrown on purpose by either the judges or the fighters?

This was over a decade ago so I don't remember the exact details, but I'm sure this was covered by the wording of the agreement and I'd have been out of luck with the bookies.

Can't comment on unrelated legal penalties, but in Japan there was match fixing in sumo and nobody got arrested (couldn't prove gambling) but a lot were fired: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Match-fixing_in_professional_s... https://factsanddetails.com/japan/cat21/sub138/item1779.html

Unfortunately, combat sports are relatively easy to fix because you only have a few people involved in the live action at a time.

>This sort of suggests that the best trading strategy would be if you had a guy inside of the censorship bureau who could help you define reality as you want it.

As far as I can tell, it seems like the betting market sites explicitly encourage insider activities, and I would not be surprised if this happened for real. See:

https://www.rawstory.com/leavitt/

>Gamblers cry foul after White House briefing ends seconds before key betting cutoff

A slightly different example because if true, the insider would be changing her behavior rather than changing the reporting of the facts. But it still shows that a small number of insiders (or a single insider) can change betting results.


Happening to the NBA gambling leagues now with both players and referees.


Ad networks yes. Also the website operators and application developers.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: