How do we know this website is legit? I won't be convinced until it's linked from them or their GitHub

WHOIS sez it was just registered, registrar is NameCheap. Uses Cloudflare DNS. .bot domain hosted on Vercel. There is a link to .ai domain with similar info.

Certificate transparency logs list everything as brand new.

Cursory glance at other Nvidia domains shows Safenames ltd as their registrar of choice.

Seems a bit sketchy

> NemoClaw is expected to be officially unveiled at NVIDIA's annual developer conference, GTC 2026, scheduled for mid-March 2026. NVIDIA has been actively presenting the platform to enterprise software companies ahead of the public announcement.

Guess we will find out.

Pangram, the best AI-detector I know of, flagged this as 100% AI generated.

That's just sad. I really feel for this author.

The writing style of this article is interested, on one hand, it's packed full of details and information like a well-researched, human-written article.

On the other, there are many ChatGPTisms, it's not this, it's that, groups of 3 terms, em-dashes, etc.

My thinking is that there was a thorough draft written by a human that then was passed through an LLM and heavily modified. Not that there's a problem with that.

Yeah and right at the top: "Key Points and Summary – " followed by the ChatGPT writing tell of "It's a <statement>: x, y, and z."

That’s just good typography and editing.

My exact reaction. I noticed the repetitiveness. Count how many times they reiterate the point that this was a shock for the US Navy.

I tried going through the latest diff, but there is so much boilerplate that I was nt able to find any real insights through skimming.

Has anyone found anything useful? Interesting needle-in-a-haystack problem for LLMs to try as well.

I created a video on the free tier, the shareable link didn't work (404), I upgraded to be able to download it, and it seems to have disappeared? It says "Still generating" in my Library.

The video UUID starts with "f5fbd6c7", hopefully that's sufficient to identify me!

Sorry about that! I found your video. Should I link it here or DM it to you (can you do DM in Hacker News?) ? You could also email me at shreyas2@stanford.edu, and I can send it there

Just emailed you! Thanks.

Is there an API? I'd love to make a music video like the one in https://pudding.cool/2025/07/street-view/

> Third, despite having been provided with a clear definition of AI companions, some respondents may have conflated general AI use (such as ChatGPT for homework help) with AI companion interactions, potentially inflating usage statistics.

I think the viability of this entire study hinges on how clear they were that they are not talking about ChatGPT, even if they use ChatGPT for things like getting advice.

I recently migrated to Linkwarden [0] from Pocket, and have been fairly happy with the decision. I haven't tried Wallabag, which is mentioned in the article.

Linkwarden is open source and self-hostable.

I wrote a python package [1] to ease the migration of Pocket exports to Linkwarden.

[0] https://linkwarden.app/

[1] https://github.com/fmhall/pocket2linkwarden

+1 for this one, Linkwarden is great!

You can self-host it on your local machine though.

Just as they were getting really popular on Twitter and X - it's such a shame. I like the idea of these alternative platforms, I'm saddened that this will likely make any kind of grassroots developer efforts DOA

Don't see why moving from the closed source Microsoft Github to free/open source codeberg would turn away any grassroots developer. It's like two extra characters to type and live coders can usually type quite fast.

the move was partly in response to that unwanted popularity

I recently migrated to Linkwarden [0] from Pocket, and have been happy with the decision.

Linkwarden is open source and self-hostable.

I wrote a python package [1] to ease the migration of Pocket exports to Linkwarden.

[0] https://linkwarden.app/

[1] https://github.com/fmhall/pocket2linkwarden