It also increases the number of former customers.

This leak just contributed to a new former customer, me. Flagging these phrases may explain exactly why I noticed cc almost immediatly change into grok lvl shit and never recover. Seriously wtf. (flagged again lol)

That question is equivalent to asking a human to add the wavelengths of those two colors and divide it by 3.

Unless you're aware of hyperspectral image adapters for LLMs they aren't capable of that either.

Unfair - human beats AI in this comparison, as human will instantly answer "I don't know" instead of yelling a random number.

Or at best "I don't know, but maybe I can find out" and proceed to finding out/ But he is unlikely to shout "6" because he heard this number once when someone talked about light.

> human will instantly answer "I don't know" instead of yelling a random number.

Seems that you never worked with Accenture consultants?

Fair.

Yet this can be filtered with fixed rules, like "output produced by corporate structures is untrusted random data".

Why is that?

Because LLMs dont have a textual representation of any text they consume. Its just vectors to them. Which is why they are so good at ignoring typos, the vector distance is so small it makes no difference to them.

Technically yes, but lol no. Population is about the same as at its peak and density (person/m2) was about four times that of today. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schlafg%C3%A4nger https://www.demokratiezentrum.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10...

You could say that about every Industrial Revolution city. They just have also had to deal with absolute population growth as well.

How do you defend them?

"Has the model really performed an extreme transformation if it is able to produce the training data near-verbatim?...."

So do 10 000 chimpanzees on typewriters.

On the other hand this possibly forces people to put their mouth where their money is. It would be great to be able to hold all those politicians and pundits at least financially accountable. Oh,so you say that this spending is not going to be a problem because the economy will grow twice that much. Sooo, how much did you bet on that? And how did your bets go last year.

Definitely interesting idea given how lockstep parties operate. Ostensibly representatives should be uh, representing local interests, over party, but we've seen this isn't the case.

So if one side is claiming something, yes, would absolutely love to see how much of their net worth is tied into betting that something would come to fruition (like lowering inflation, or medical care, or increasing jobs, etc)

That's actually a great idea!

An additional problem seems to be that this law had some congressional check that has been ruled unconstitutional since.

What was Hunter Bidens official job and what corrupt official acts did he commit? Some private third party hires some washed up relative of someone in power is looking decidedly quaint if you look at the brazenness and dimensions of the current administration.

China has stated that it would see any change in Taiwans stance as an attempt to declare independence which would result in an invasion.

Sounds like 5D chess, since Taiwan applied to be the "sole legal government of China" in the UN back in the 50s. (which was rejected) then they rejected the 70s resolution of "two Chinas". So it comes through as ambitious. But I will let the Taiwanese correct me on that.

Yes, the situation was different in the 50s and 70s. But for the last few decades it has been explicit chinese policy that any change of the status quo would lead to an invasion.

Somewhat similar to HongKong where China apologists always bring up that HK never had any democratic autonomy while conveniently not mentioning that China explicitly stated that such would instantly result in an invasion.

Putting a gun to someones head forcing him to say something and then using that against him.

No, they have diametrically opposite incentives. They want you to pay the subscription without using their resources. Like a fitness studio.