Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | arkh's commentslogin

That's because there is no Antimemetics Division.

Anecdotally: an endocrinologist diagnosed me a macroprolactinoma just by seeing me entering for a consult about another problem.

"You're here for a prolactinoma?" "Nope" "I'd like to get this blood work done tho"

One week later the blood work confirmed her hunch.

Experience can get some crazy results.


Did they state what made them have that hunch?

Originally pensions were created so people who could not work would not be destitute.

The fact it became an all-inclusive all-year-round vacation reward is an anomaly which is getting corrected. Too bad for us we're the generations holding the bag.


At 60/65 (women/men) years old pensioners could contribute a lot to society in their last decade or more of active life.

Caring for grandchildren, running clubs and societies, giving their experience to local politics.

At 60, women who had daughters at 30, whose daughters just had children would be well placed to help with childrearing.

These sorts of things got lost in UK with equality and the pensions crisis.


There was a response about starting businesses. I consider those in their 60s to be capable of contributing to financial systems (eg businesses), I was just focusing on social aspects that have seemingly been lost with societal/political changes. So it was contribution in the non-financial sense I was particularly thinking of.

I suppose when we look at things like the 4-day week, we imagine more time and energy available for social cohesion. Or I do at least.


My theory is: when it started being a bad thing to have any cash reserve.

With some reserve on the side, a company can survive bad times and not fire people. This is the kind of behavior employee will appreciate and make some diehard loyal.

But this available money is money not making more. So that's a bad thing these days and so the only easy variable available to survive is to remove excess workforce. It took some time for people to understand loyalty has been one-way only but now employers are reaping what they've sown.


Is there any data to support your theory? Because most of the companies at the top of the S&P 500 have enormous cash (and equivalent) reserves.

It makes sense to burn reserves and keep good employees around through a temporary cyclical economic downturn. But most of the large layoffs lately have been driven by secular changes that management expects to be permanent.


Mistral is entering the "let's extract has much money from EU taxpayers as we can" phase of European tech company which did not get bought by a US one.

They'll end like Dailymotion, just a zombie company.


What's crazy is the glee when saying that. It's like "fuck those uppity low class people who managed to move up socially thanks to an in-demand job requiring some skill". Now we're back to only who you know, skills are for the AI.


> What's the defense?

Prosecuting every one of those blackmailers. If this kind of crime starts going into the "you're gonna get caught and jailed 100%" category, less people will try it.


What if the blackmailer is anonymous and abroad?


That's not a defence, that's a remedy.


Reminds me how windows 98 allowed using a HTML page as background. Said HTML could include videos.


And then there is X11, whatever program you want can be set to the root window.

Anyhow, on topic, that windows 98 active desktop was the most unstable part of an already shaky OS. First thing to turn off when installing a new system. I mean, it would still crash if you looked at it wrong. But at least it was not dying for the fun of it anymore.


Geez, teen me loved the shininess of Active Desktop, although my Pentium 100 couldn't run it smoothly at all...


> Where are these hyper productive small companies running laps around bigger ones right now?

Getting bought by the bigger companies as it is currently the goal of most start-up since no one cares about monopolies and anti competitive behavior nowadays.


And remember: they don't call you a nazi because they think you are. They call you a nazi to make you a valid target.


Are there many cases where calling someone a Nazi - especially powerful people - actually did something to their lives? Ruin their careers, ruin them financially, led to their family breaking up?


Trump has had how many assassination attempts now? The attempt in Pennsylvania killed an innocent bystander, a father, in the crowd.

Charlie Kirk was called Nazi by many and eventually shot dead in front of his children.

So yes, unfortunately.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_assassination_of_Don...

> FBI deputy director Paul Abbate called Crooks's activity on social networking services antisemitic, anti-immigrant, extreme, and espousing political violence.

Hmm....


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: