Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | beacon294's commentslogin

This is wrong, Claude is the worst of the best: codex, pi, opencode, droid/factory, there are many more others can vouch for.

You were wrong at percentage. The question is what count would want this.

I had the same but I am thinking of updating to see if I can optimize my terminal a bit. Roboto has font weights, and probably has a better emoji pack, although that's just a guess -- maybe google doesn't tack on emojis by default.

Sometimes I see a silver lining to this behavior but it comes down to personal taste. A number of people likely appreciate that nice buffer between them and Kihei.

Do you mean the distribution of representable numbers as floats or do you mean real numbers? I always assumed infinity was stored between 0-1 because you can 1/x everything. But I have never had enough free opportunity time for maths.


I'm not sure how to answer because I'm not sure which question you're asking.

For infinity, neither can you calculate +/-inf but there also aren't an infinite set of representable numbers on [0,1]. You get more with fp64 and more with fp128 but it's still finite. This is what leads to that thing where you might add numbers and get something like 1.9999999998 (I did not count the number of 9s). Look at how numbers are represented on computers. It uses a system with mantissa and exponents. You'll see there are more representable numbers on [-1,1] than in other ranges. Makes that kind of normalization important when doing math work on computers.

This also causes breakdowns in seemingly ordinary math. Such as adding and multiplying not being associative. It doesn't work with finite precision, which means you don't want fields to with in. This is regardless of the precision level, which is why I made my previous comment.

For real numbers, we're talking about computers. Computers only use a finite subset of the real numbers. I'm not sure why you're bringing them up


My problem was simply chrome so I switched to brave.


I read the old forums carefully:

[BIG Warning: this didn't work for child commenter]

- simply decline/reject the TOS on install. It will auto uninstall the installer and go away.

Life has been good since.


I TRUSTED YOU! Nooooooooo!

Anyway, I hope you're happy.

(I thought it would show me a TOS prompt again, but it did not. My bad.)


What? Let me put this warning in the top comment. I got one.


FWIW the lockout probably wasn't related... maybe the content you were working on or your context window management somehow triggered something?


It's up.


I would like to know why it is correcting thanks to Thanksgiving.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: