Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ckunte's commentslogin

With the wisdom from a TU Delft graduate student, I switched from Word to LaTeX in 2007, having never known or used it ever before, and never looked back for the next seventeen years. Using it within the corp. environ. (Shell) became progressively harder as time went by due to the need to install such a large installation (under Cygwin, which itself got on the list of not-allowed, and had to resort to `setup-x86_64.exe --no-admin` for nearly all my subsequent time there).

While I appreciate LaTeX structure, and the resulting end product (Knuth is God), it is as you know highly verbose in markup, thereby making the content somewhat unclean, and not easily readable like plain text (my yardstick on content readability and re-usability). I wrote multiple plug-ins for the text editors of my choice Sublime Text, and Vim to produce snippets for writing ease.

- https://github.com/ckunte/latex-snippets-st

- https://github.com/ckunte/latex-snippets-vim

Switched to Typst cautiously in 2023, and have never since looked back. If LaTeX was the gold standard for the 20th century, I think Typst is on track to become that for the 21st.

I wrote a little note about writing a template for Typst to remind myself how-to, and for anyone I'm working with:

- https://ckunte.net/2025/template


Long time Sublime Text and Sublime Merge fan, and a paying user since 2011. It's very good; I use all three OSes (Windows at work, MacOS on occasion, Linux is primary driver, and I've now switched to Pi 5. Zed does not even load on this, whereas ST just flies. (The only real competition is Neovim.)

That reminds me, I wonder if Sublime Text still has room to improve in some areas. Here's an example, in Vim generating a date stamp is a one liner incl. text expansion[0], whereas in Sublime Text, one has to write a multi line plugin and a separate keyboard shortcut[1] to get the same functionality as that of Vim.

[0]: https://gist.github.com/ckunte/2d7a750e6cf8b96f98f028e90c8ab...

[1]: https://gist.github.com/ckunte/31500c17452b0fd8c55bc9460bd9c...


I think it would be cool to see some built-in commands for common things like that. But I think the fact that your plugin is so small and so quick to add, proves that going that route is probably the best one. I'm sure if there was a plugin out there that added dozens of these little commands, it would probably do pretty well.


You can achieve the same thing using the arithmetic command in the command palette: `__import__('datetime').datetime.now().strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M")`.


Thank you, Ben. Wow! TIL.


I'd like to mention two tools that I love and use: detox (https://github.com/dharple/detox) -- for sanitising filenames; and mtm (https://github.com/deadpixi/mtm) -- smallest terminal multiplexer.


What if you choose not to share? Do they still retain the right to publish?


The post does not discuss its "sophistication", it merely validates Google Webmaster Tools's built-in labs feature 'fetch as Googlebot,' which the Official Google Webmaster Central fails to mention (curl) in its long post (http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/11/generic-c... ).

The point besides is that you do not need to have a Google Webmaster Tools account to use this feature.


I'd love a rss/feed link for this.


I'd like two. ;)


Market research.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: