It doesn’t.

The pen is the material.

Some alternative reporting:

https://www.wired.com/story/mark-zuckerberg-testifies-social...

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/mark-zucke...

Fascinating how differently Musk's testimony is portrayed in the WSJ vs by Rolling Stone.

@dang at least the RS story vs. paywall please.

There's a difference between "things you are interested in" and "things that will make you addicted".

> The Moroun family - the American owners of the neighbouring Ambassador Bridge that also connects Detroit to Canada - appealed to Trump during his first term to stop construction of the new bridge, arguing that it infringed on their exclusive ability to collect tolls.

Ah, that’s why he cares.

Even better, he supported it during his first term.

> Trump and then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issued a joint statement saying the bridge was a "vital economic link" between the countries.

> A subset of the population doesn't have self control? Ban it everyone. Even if it's a wildly popular form of entertainment

Like gambling?

or cigarettes?

Or drugs?

Or coffee?

The drug so popular no one thinks of it as a drug any more.

"One of these things is not like the others..."

What are the harmful effects of a full blown coffee addiction? Headaches?

What are the effects of an LSD addiction? Oh you can't, because LSD is anti–addictive. But it's still schedule 1 while coffee is uncontrolled.

Or sugar?

Cigarettes are drugs

You can only let that go so far, because at the end of the day you need to pay the military to keep you in power.

In the long run we're all dead. In the meantime, NK is still standing.

The rules are rather different when your economy is mostly oil - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrostate

No, it depends on whether they have an ownership stake in what they’re funding or not.

All a matter of if the project dies when the money fountain runs dry, and developers have to find another way to pay bills other than a few meagre donations.

Ok sure, but now you’re just describing something completely different.

Nope, it is still the community getting funding out of somewhere.

> The lesson is that you should stop caring about breaking people’s code who go against the documentation this way. When it breaks you shrug. Their code was always buggy and it just happened to be working for them until then. You are not their dad. You are not responsible for their misfortune.

Sure, but good luck running a business with that mindset.

Apple is pretty successful.

It's fully supported as of version 139[0], so since ~June of last year.

[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Refe...