Yes.

As per the wording of the article, that is the correct understanding.

Propylene Glycol and Vegetable Glycerin are not good to inhale. How is this 'Vaping' related?

I'll step up and say it.

Google in 2019 is a bloated and incompetent company consumed by internal politics that has no vision. Chrome has been nothing but a ploy for google to ruin the web from the get go.

> no vision

Missing the boat on cloud computing while they were flailing away at social is pretty strong evidence of that

> ruin the web

The web was pretty bad pre-Chrome. Browsers were much slower and much less compatible. Things started to get worse once Chrome market share got to a third, or so, and Google started driving the direction of the web.

Remember when Chrome was flaunted as the fastest browser? Now it's just bloated.

I do, but I also switched back to Firefox recently (after using Chrome for ten years) and it's slower. What _is_ the fastest feature-complete browser in 2019?

I used to a big fan of Google. I bought chrome book but now I am unhappy because I can’t run Firefox on it. Next I will buy windows pc because you have the ability to install Firefox on it.

Edge Dev is pretty darn fast.

Isn't Edge switching to being a skinned Chromium?

Yes. Edge Dev is a Chromium flavor.

It's not that Chrome itself is a problem but rather the way that Google releases updates for Chrome which damages the ecosystem. Build a good browser that helps users load elements faster and enjoy the web more? Always good!

Changing this same browser to make your sites load faster while not announcing these changes so your competitors scramble while meanwhile you go "what, me worry?"

Just pathetic really. It's not like they were trying to push us past some inefficiencies, just taking us to ones they owned.

How are you sure that the data you are getting is valid and relative to your existence?

World's most boring ideology.

They'll get a percentage of the total overall users based on time of usage. Really how else would they incentivize this?

Trump has been informed that CrowdStrike never found shit and never could have. It was a hit job, 'IP from RUSSIA, RUSSIAN, CYRILLIC characters!'... anyone who understands these technologies understands that's stupid. I buy a VPN, tunnel to RU, insert some cyrllic in my code, send an exploit, and that's your so-called "evidence" and "proof". Help me see this otherwise, honestly.

Like including "Guccifer 2.0" the "hacker" that originally claimed responsibility for the DNC breach being outed as a Russian intel agent directly linked to the GRU or aside from that?

Anyone can claim responsibility, and moreover, being 'responsible' doesn't mean you had some capabilities. Such as with skiddies who employ a chinese DDOS botnet. The people responsible are the ones running the botnets and selling their useage, not the people trying to utilize this.

Have you tried just researching this a little? I think it would answer most of your questions.