This is the same on anything with DRM. You can watch content without DRM and you’ll be limited to 720p but you can take screenshots.

I don’t like it either but it has nothing to do with Apple.

You can use the GHC musl container: benz0li/ghc-musl:9.8.4 to create static binaries. I've specialized that into -arm64 and -amd64 containers for forgejo actions.

Anytime I push to my Haskell repos my actions automatically create static binaries for installation on my nodes.

As an intermediate Haskell programmer, I’ve found that using AI to debug or learn Haskell is a better use of time than generating a lot of code with it.

Even without AI most of my Haskell time is spent thinking.

Also, I hand writing Haskell is one of my small after work pleasures.

I don't like AI - but I also can't (wont) write web pages. This seems to be the best of both worlds.

Human artform is still alive and well as evidenced by this post.

Yes, an LLM can write it, it’ll probably work. Yet, it’ll remain meaningless slop while this is not.

The problem, at least for me, is that by now I'm so desensitized that I won't even bother looking at something, because it could potentially be the product of a few prompts. The LLM noise is drowning out the human signal, so to speak. Same for articles, blog posts, etc. It only takes a few em-dashes, a few "it's not this, it's that" to lose faith in the text's authenticity, and with that, any interest in its content.

I don't believe I'm the target market (I'm plenty happy with my small CU), and seeing their billboards makes me want to never use them BUT: seeing this post and their culture and that they use Haskell is kinda changing my mind.

What’s wrong with their billboards?

Typical SF garbage billboards with either “AI” or something they think is clever but isn’t.

Mercury is pretty tame by comparison I’ll admit.

I don’t get the hype. I own, use and also completely love my xpan so I like the format, wideluxx isn’t even close to that.

You get none of the Hasselblad glass and distortion (which I guess is what people go for with this?) for more than 100% the price of an xpan?

Yes I do admit that the xpan isn’t made anymore but imo it’s still king even if you have to buy another one.

They're apples and oranges. But aren't the Xpan's going for a similar price if you include a lens?

The Xpan is electronic so when it dies, there's a very low chance it can be fixed.

This one is fully mechanical so has a better chance over longer periods.

Haskell is very elegant and pretty. It's hard to describe what pretty is when it comes to programming languages, but imo golang is ugly, rust is good, and Haskell the best.

Writing a cli with JavaScript? No thank you.

It's typescript and pretty sure all of the Official Bitwarden clients are written in it.

I wrote a version in Python and then rust back before the official CLI was released. Now you can use https://github.com/doy/rbw instead, much better maintained (since I don't use Bitwarden anymore).

What do you use?

I have family I need to support, so I use 1password. It also helped that work gives me a 1P family plan free.

The practical differences to me:

    * 1P is aimed at non-tech users more than Bitwarden.
    * 1P lets you easily store things other than just passwords (serial #'s, license info, SSN's, etc) You can in Bitwarden, but it's a little annoying.
    * 1P lets you store SSH keys(by effectively being an ssh-agent): https://developer.1password.com/docs/ssh/

All that said, I still happily recommend BW, especially for people that are cost-conscious, the free BW plan is Good Enough for most everyone.

Security wise, they are equivalent enough to not matter.

Bitwarden can also act as an ssh-agent: https://bitwarden.com/help/ssh-agent/

Ah, nice!

I think a couple of failures are necessary for this kind of work.