Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mrexcess's commentslogin

>Like, does this guy think this single woman is responsible for the kafka-esque trap they're both in?

If there's any class of individual in whom I'm willing to place greater than average trust in their ability to read vocal tones, it's probably blind people. Just sayin'.


>NED is not a CIA front sweatie

Curious: can you show the research steps you took to reach this conclusion? Really curious how we can all easily determine which companies are and aren't CIA fronts!


>As the article states, this war was not unprovoked either

Using the same extraordinarily broad definition of "provocation" required here, can you name a single war in history that was unprovoked? And if not, haven't we just neutralized all meaning from the phrase "provoked war" with our overly broad definition of "provocation"?


What you see here is the limits of liberal discourse on war, it's always 'here are the reasons why the war is justified' now let me explain why i'm against the war. Then discourse devolves into 'what is war even'? Believe in something, anything, dear god.

After being restarted, the red (opposing) force general resigned due to the restarted game having what amounted to a scripted end, with little to no latitude for the red force to exercise creativity in strategy or tactics. Among the highlights, the red force were required to turn on and leave on their AA radars so that blue force HARMs could take them out, and the red force was prohibited from attempting to shoot down any of the 82nd airborne / marine air assault forces during the assault.

Gen. Van Riper's tactics were apparently discredited in 2002 because they were unfair, but Iran seems not to have received the memo since their moves bear more than a passing resemblance to his.


We have not gotten quite to the "VDV tries air assault, gets wiped out" stage of Iran war yet, as far as I know.

But the US seems to be committed on repeating the Russian experience.


Similar complaints from Trump the other day

“So, it’s it’s uh little unfair. You know, you win a war, but they have no right to be doing what they’re doing.”

https://x.com/ME_Observer_/status/2033768757688934424


In fighting games, this is exactly the way "scrubs" think. They lose and appeal to some vague notion of fairness to avoid confronting the reality - they lost!

Would be funny if it wasn't real.


I feel the comparison is too apples-to-oranges, games are designed things with goals like the enjoyment of participants and—on at least some level—a fair playing field.

Wow! He is saying: we said that we won, but they are winning... how are they allowed to be winning when we said that we won... so unfair...

And with him saying that, millions of his followers instantly started believing it with no second thought.

It’s all the VAR referee’s fault.

>Vulnerabilities have nothing to do with country of manufacture.

That depends on how you define "Vulnerability", doesn't it?

For instance, from some standpoints, the absence rather than presence of a backdoor in consumer routers could be considered a "vulnerability", no?


You're making great software and I'm sorry this happened to you. Don't get discouraged, keep bringing the open source disruption!

>Idk, while system architecture diagrams look cool and feel informative, I generally don't feel like they actually help you get started working somewhere on a project.

Can't speak to that, but they're enormously helpful in reviewing the security architecture of a design, especially when you're doing this at scale and might only get a few hours to look into a given project.


Given the Greenland stuff, isn't it within EU and UK's interests to keep the US occupied in Iran?


It's more complex, especially when considering Ukraine and Israel's appetite for weapons and ordnance. Every missile or drone canceled or delayed or rerouted to support Israel is one less Ukraine has to defend itself. Given Europe's investment and interest in the war, they should be very nervous about a prolonged or intensified conflict in the middle east that harms EU geostrategy.


> It's more complex, especially when considering Ukraine and Israel's appetite for weapons and ordnance. Every missile or drone canceled or delayed or rerouted to support Israel is one less Ukraine has to defend itself.

Except how much is the US/Trump actually helping Ukraine nowadays? How much are they providing? And how dependent on the US does Ukraine actually want to be given Trump's fandom of Putin?


And to ease oil prices, the US takes its already limited pressure off Russia meanwhile. Given the Ukraine situation, I can't see how that helps EU and UK.


Possibly. However:

- Europe gets a lot of it's oil through the Straits of Hormuz.

- Xi might see this as his opportunity to attack Taiwan.

It is just a huge mess in which everyone loses. Except perhaps Netanyahu and Trump, personally.


> Europe gets a lot of it's oil through the Straits of Hormuz.

20 mb/d, around 25% world seaborne oil trade, transits the Strait – 80% destined for Asia. 4%, of the region’s crude flows are routed into Europe

LNG - In 2025, almost 90% of the total volumes exported via the Strait of Hormuz was destined to the Asian market, while the share of Europe was just over 10%.

Volume of oil (or LNG) isnt really the problem for the western hemisphere, its the doubling of price.


I found this:

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/charted-oil-trade-through-t...

3.8% is a lot less than the news reports were implying. But, as you say, it will drive up the global price.


If we finally get the broad roll-out of renewable energy out of this, that would be a silver lining to this horrible mess. I hope it is a "Things need to get worse to get better" type of situation.


Disagree only in the sense that I think the drama escalated a bit in the interregnum, as the BBS scene merged into one large if fragmentary collective on the internet. Empirical evidence for that extreme level of drama and complexity here:

https://www.wired.com/2001/12/sexchart-degrees-of-separation


GETOLD /index.html "2026-03-11T10:30:45Z" would be such cool functionality...


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: