Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pc256's commentslogin

Qriously | London | ONSITE | https://www.qriously.com

At Qriously, we are building a new research platform which we believe is bigger, faster, and more accurate than any other. With our platform we can ask questions anywhere in the world and within seconds start getting answers from thousands of people.

Current Tech Stack ...

- Backend : Java / Spring / Kafka / Docker / AWS

- Front-end : Typescript / React / Redux

If you're interested in building the next-generation of survey and research tools then we'd love to hear from you. We have 3 open positions ...

- Senior Backend Engineer : https://qriously.workable.com/j/B66103F009

- Front-end Engineer : https://qriously.workable.com/j/C0ECA0F401

- Full-stack Engineer : https://qriously.workable.com/j/C25613AEF0


Qriously (https://www.qriously.com) | Senior Front-End Engineer | London, UK | ONSITE | Full-time | £50k - £70k

At Qriously we are building a next-generation research platform which we believe is bigger, faster, and more accurate than any other.

We are inquisitive people and we love asking questions - with our platform we can ask questions anywhere in the world and within seconds start getting answers from thousands of people. We do this by serving our questions to smart phones via mobile-apps, meaning we can reach hundreds of millions of people. Our methods are proven and can be applied to different research fields including political polling, consumer insight surveys and campaign effectiveness monitoring.

We are looking for a Senior Front-End Engineer to build the next versions of our mobile surveys (which are seen by millions of people every day!), our new data dashboards and to also shape the future of our front-end architecture. Our front-end tech stack is currently uses React, ES6 and flow.

Some of the other benefits we offer include: - Flexible working times / working from home - Generous holiday allowance - Choose your own kit - Free Gym Membership - Free Books (we like reading!) - A glimpse into the future, before anyone else knows about it

Further details - https://qriously.workable.com/jobs/708982 or email me direct on p.campton@qriously.com


One billion dollars, well perhaps they will have a little spare change to invest in protecting their users ... https://www.channel4.com/news/children-bombarded-with-sexual...


Well yes, outstanding bills should be paid. But I don't think the UK has been leaching, in fact the UK has been a net contributor to the EU for a long period of time [1]. As we are leaving the EU will we in some way get to reclaim some of the assets paid for over the period of time? Do we get the roof of the parliament in Strasbourg?

Until we've actually left, we are bound by the rules of the EU which may include this. And given the current alignment of rules I wouldn't imagine it would be a huge burden. Once we've left, well paying associated costs may be a sensible thing to do, but that's for us to decide!

[1] https://fullfact.org/europe/our-eu-membership-fee-55-million...


> in fact the UK has been a net contributor to the EU for a long period of time

Your membership fee was lower (per-capita, per-GDP) than other countries. That membership fee has bought you services, the same services that other countries have been enjoying, and paying at a premium compared to the UK. The UK has been a member of the EU by its own decision for over 30 years. Nothing to complain about there. On the other hand, EU members which have been paying premium membership price should very seriously consider adding to the exit bill whatever rebates have been granted to the UK during all these years.

> As we are leaving the EU will we in some way get to reclaim some of the assets paid for over the period of time? Do we get the roof of the parliament in Strasbourg?

When I am renting an apartment, and I need to pay for something that needs repair, I do not ask for money back whenever I leave. There may be some assets that you have a right to claim a stake in, though. There are also some open bills. That is a matter of exit negotiations.

By the way, who is paying for the financial burden that the negotiations themselves are going to put in the EU? I hope that is also a matter of negotiations, and since it is a UK decision to leave (which we respect), the UK must contribute specially to those costs.

> And given the current alignment of rules I wouldn't imagine it would be a huge burden

1. Since there will not be automatic law alignment, we can not guarantee this long-term

2. There won't be a framework to enforce this, since the EU will have no jurisdiction in the UK, and vice versa. Creating a third-party enforcement framework seems too big of a burden.

> Once we've left, well paying associated costs may be a sensible thing to do, but that's for us to decide!

For you ... and for the EU. As said, I do not think it is in the interest of the EU to deal with issues at these level of detail with each potential partner. We already deal with this at the EU level, put it in to law, and let the common EU enforcement mechanisms do the management. No need to duplicate this structure for each partner and each scheme that our partners would like to enjoy.

A better solution, discussed at length, would be to negotiate access to the EU market (which includes these kind of schemes) with the UK. But this has already been ruled out by Theresa May, since it assumes acceptance of the four freedoms.


Excluding Germany, Britain’s contribution is more than the total net contribution of the 26 other EU states combined.

https://i1.wp.com/order-order.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01...


A bit more context would be helpful for such a complex issue.

That's for 2015. Total? What about per-capita? What about per-GDP? Are you expecting Malta to contribute more than the UK?


I think they were referring to net contributions - Malta is a massive net recipient per capita (https://inews.co.uk/explainers/charts/much-uk-pays-eu-much-g...)


Net contributions are misleading. The members pay a fee according to their population and GDP. According to that, the UK is paying little.

What happens with those paid fees is complex, but agreed between the members. Roughly described:

* the fees go to the EU budget

* some of the fees are used to pay for EU administration

* some of the fees are used to pay for EU projects

* one big program is "Investment in depressed regions, EU-wide". The UK is not a big beneficiary of this program because fortunately its regions are relatively rich. Some regions are poor, and they do receive funds.

The reason why the UK is net contributor is because it is a rich country.

Its gross contribution is small, GDP and capita-wise.


Well one way to look at it is that the other 27 countries will have to increase their contributions just to break even, or reduce spending.


Well, the UK has massively benefited from its EU membership. I don't think we'll have that much money around after we leave, our trade will take a hit, our companies will have less access to EU talent (which is massively needed in IT at least), so we will be less competitive.

I do think all that extra money we paid in the EU was easily recovered.

It's going to be ironic when we have less money around than before paying into the EU :(


I agree we had a reasonably good deal - but the net contributions weren't massively different from other large nations (France, Germany, Italy) [1]. In my view that's very different from leaching.

> When I am renting an apartment, and I need to pay for something that needs repair, I do not ask for money back whenever I leave. There may be some assets that you have a right to claim a stake in, though. There are also some open bills. That is a matter of exit negotiations.

I don't think anyone sensible would be suggesting the EU refund all the contributions made whilst we were members. As for negotiations, I wouldn't fancy being a horse in the near future.

> By the way, who is paying for the financial burden that the negotiations themselves are going to put in the EU? I hope that is also a matter of negotiations, and since it is a UK decision to leave (which we respect), the UK must contribute specially to those costs.

The EU itself devised the mechanism for leaving the EU so this should have probably been specified at the time - if it wasn't then it probably wasn't a great piece of legislation.

> For you ... and for the EU.

Yes, I only mentioned the UK as I imagine the EU isn't going to bend massively so it will be more a case of whether the UK wishes to agree to certain terms set out by the EU rather than crafting a UK-specific deal. Though I guess we'll find out.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/nov/22/eu-bud...


  > When I am renting an apartment, and I need to pay for
  > something that needs repair, I do not ask for money back
  > whenever I leave.
When I am renting, and something needs repairing, I tell the landlord & they arrange for it to be fixed (and pay for it).

(I don't understand this metaphor)


Sorry, my bad, I meant:

"When I am renting, and I leave the appartment, I do not claim the rent back"


Thanks for clarifying!


Who cares what the membership fee was without considering how that fee is redistributed?

The UK is one of very few net contributors. They haven't leached, quite the opposite.


That fee is not money you put in for nothing, you put in for the services you get.

The question is if the UK has paid its fair share, adjusted for population and GDP, for the services it got.


Qriously (qriously.com) - London, UK - Full-time - Frontend Engineer

We've developed a data platform for serving questions to billions of people in real­time for use in mobile advertising, research, and business intelligence. We're looking for a frontend engineer to help us build beautiful interactive components for web and mobile.

A few of nice things we offer include a competitive salary, unlimited holiday, gym membership.

For more information … http://qrious.ly/1PcyKoI


Qriously (www.qriously.com) - London, UK - Full Time - Backend Software Engineer

We've developed a data platform for serving questions to billions of people in real­time for use in mobile advertising, research, and business intelligence. We're looking for a backend software engineer to help us build our platform and develop new products.

As an ideal candidate... * You know that 1ms is an eternity, and 10^9 isn’t big yet. * You know a single line of code can save or cost a lot of money * You love to make yourself and others more productive * You know that you can learn anything if you want to (which probably explains a weird skill or two!)

A few of nice things we offer include a competitive salary, unlimited holiday, gym membership.

For more information … http://qrious.ly/1DEvxvO


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: