Not facetious at all, its an interesting question I never thought about.
In principle I can't think of anything preventing God from making another specie (or thing) also bearing the image of God. Perhaps God has did this already.
I think perhaps God can also become other things. While the idea that God incarnating as a GPU die sound really weird, I also can't think of anything making this impossible. However, my post was claiming that human's special status (not necessarily uniqueness) derives from the imago dei, not intelligence. Thus, I don't think God has any special reason to become a computer just because they have become really smart. God didn't become a human because we are intelligent, so if God is going to incarnate again I don't see any reason to be a computer as opposed to anything else.
And you're right that Christianity does make some weird claims. A theology based on the incarnation has to be weird, but to christians thats probably more of a feature than a bug. Afterall, observing a miracle is weird. However, the claims of Christianity is also very specific. Thus, it leaves a lot of possibilities open.
I did a bit of research and found this interesting declaration from an ecumenical council basically claiming God has not and will not incarnate a second time as some non-human thing:
> If anyone shall say that Christ, of whom it is said that he appeared in the form of God, and that he was united before all time with God the Word, and humbled himself in these last days even to humanity, had (according to their expression) pity upon the various falls which had appeared in the spirits united in the same unity (of which he himself is part), and that to restore them he passed through various classes, had different bodies and different names, became all to all, an Angel among Angels, a Power among Powers, has clothed himself in the different classes of reasonable beings with a form corresponding to that class, and finally has taken flesh and blood like ours and has become man for men; [if anyone says all this] and does not profess that God the Word humbled himself and became man: let him be anathema. [1]
I think this is binding to Catholic and Eastern Orthodox believers. However, I'm not familiar with the context of this ecumencial council, and I assume this declaration is probably not pushing back against the possibility of silicon Jesus or alien Jesus, since its targeting extreme Origenism (a group of non-orthodox Christians )
> Typescript, Visual Studio Code, GitHub, npm, and so much more exist primarily because Microsoft executives believe this will lead to more business for Azure and other Microsoft offerings.
I don't think its a conspiracy theory to think Microsoft releases their tools with the intention of people using their paid platforms/services. But the original person I replied to definitely thinks the author of the blog post is implying something insidious, which they don't seem to be.
I use Obsidian for daily notes. I’m not sure why someone who primarily uses Obsidian would reach for another app just for daily notes.
I was able to specify the folder for my daily notes and the format for their naming. I also have a template setup for them. There is a button in the sidebar that opens the current days note and creates it if it doesn’t already exist. I believe this was all out of the box. I then download a plugin that gives me a calendar, so I can visually see which days I have a note, as well as pre-make a future note.
I use daily notes at work to track what I’m working on any given day. If I know I need to do something on a certain day that isn’t a meeting, I use the calendar to generate that future note and write down whatever I’ll need when the day comes. My daily note template is pretty basic, it has a todo section (where I stick to the Ivy Lee method[0]) and a section for notes that are related to the day and don’t deserve their own file (like meetings and one-off support issues).
For a while, when I had to track everything, I wrote a little something to let me easily append text to my daily note. I ended up writing this I HammerSpoon (Lua), bash, and Apple Shortcuts. I used all 3 at various points in time. It made it really easy to append to my daily notes with a time stamped note from wherever I was without breaking flow. I could select any given day on the calendar and see how I spent that day. It was nice to have, but I also like the freedom of not having to do that anymore.
I haven’t used Logseq, but that is mostly because when I looked at trying it a year or so ago, most of what I saw online were people saying it was buggy, and I wasn’t sure what it would offer than Obsidian wasn’t already providing me. That said, there is no reason not to give them both a try and see what you like best.
When I'm familiar with the source, the headlines are enough for me to know if I want to read, navigating the folders is super quick, and the feed indicator makes adding new ones very easy too.
reply