Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | squeaky-clean's commentslogin

If you look at any other details of this it is very clearly vibecoded.

> Long-running tasks like batch mode completions and agent sessions may incur overages beyond your project spend cap.

> Billing data processing times can be delayed in AI Studio, up to around 10 minutes. You may experience overages beyond your project cap if billing data hasn't processed before more charges are accrued.

https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/billing#project-spend-...

That's a soft cap, not a hard cap


I'm reading a book by Asimov at the moment, printed 1989. The first page is an ad for a Robert Silverberg book adaptation of the Nightfall short story. Pages 2-3 are ads for other Asimov books. The last 5 pages are an excerpt of Edge of Eternity. And the final page is an advertisement for Voice of the Planet, a "5 episode TBS miniseries starring William Shatner and Faye Dunaway"


"My AI writing isn't slop. It's just as good as buzzfeed lists or celebrity gossip articles."


Those are just awful compared to the side view of a pelican on a bike.


Have you seen a pelican from underneath? There's not much to show!


Which of these programs is easier to review

  {x{x,sum -2#x}/0 1}
or

  def f(n):
      if n <= 1:
          return n
      else:
          return f(n-1) + f(n-2)
They're both the same program


Good question.

But it is orthogonal to the question of evaluating 2000 lines of AI code vs 200 lines of human written code. Either the human or the AI could produce idiomatic code for either language, given sufficient training data in the AI’s corpus for the language.

My guess is that the first one is much quicker to review, for a human equally fluent in both languages.


There's already feedback in the gitlab issue that the top commenter linked. Their HN comment isn't really adding anything

Hit me with the downvotes, but the only thing their comment has contributed to is causing arguments.


Just today I asked Claude Code to generate migrations for a change, and instead of running the createMigration script it generated the file itself, including the header that says

  // This file was generated with 'npm run createMigrations' do not edit it
When I asked why it tried doing that instead of calling the createMigrations script, it told me it was faster to do it this way. When I asked you why it wrote the header saying it was auto-generated with a script, it told me because all the other files in the migrations folder start with that header.

Opus 4.7 xhigh by the way


If they're shuttering this farm because peaches are no longer profitable, why would someone else pay for these trees?


I like Codea for iOS, though the free version has a soft-limit at 500 lines. If a project gets bigger than 500 lines you can still run code but it'll nag you to upgrade.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: