iOS Safari. I see a yellow banner, the navigation bar and the rest of the screen is just a warning sign image.

Is there more..?

Checked on Chrome too, I see nothing.

iOS Chrome

What do you mean? You see nothing on the website?

I captured the full page, you can view it here: https://wormhole.app/MbljK6#qfysvKJOQh1whLcMz9JXxw

This is the screen on my phone.

https://wormhole.app/9Xv0p0#Hsq0fhLpWsr8ndJDktt2YQ

You see the little "Red hat Enterprise" at the bottom? That's the whole scrollable area. The rest is fixed and stays at the top.

Must be an iOS thing. On Blink and Gecko the page just scrolls like normal, the warning scrolls with the rest of the page when scrolling down.

They still messed up the CSS because the downloads table goes straight beyond the mobile viewport on the bottom and to the right.

1. You can add a bookmark that executes enough JavaScript to download the VSIX as usual. 2. I think you can patch the product.json from VSCodium to use VSCode. Gets overwritten on every update probably.

Honestly though, it's easier to disable ~three settings in VSCode and call it a day.

This. Their current approach is open sourced. There's no going back any more.

Also note that our use case is much simpler. The programming language tells you whether your merge created a valid document.

I've never seen that information actually being used in any merge tool, with the notable exception of Visual Studio/C# (where you get symbol resolution for the merged doc, but even there the autogenerated result is a bit hit and miss)

I think the reason is that the algorithms want to be content-agnostic.

But it's of course weird — as a user — to see a conflict resolution tool confidently return something that's not even syntactically valid.

I develop prototypes using Claude Code. The dead boring stuff.

"Implement JWT token verification and role checking in Spring Boot. Secure some endpoints with Oauth2, some with API key, some public."

C# and Java are so old, whatever solutions you find are 5 years out of date. Having an agent implement and verify the foundation is the perfect fit. There's no design, just ever-chaning framework magic. I'd do the same "Google and debug" cycle, but 10 times slower.

It's kind of funny to see you saying "whatever solution you find are 5 years out of date", while at the same time saying that the tool that was taught using those same 5 years out of date solutions as a part of its training data is actually good.

Terrible idea if you ask me. I'd suggest checking the official docs next time around, or at the very least copying them into the context window.

First, good agents do that themselves. Second, specifying an exact and current version also works. Third, I'm mostly concerned about having a working example. I'm talking about breaking changes and APIs not existing in newer framework version. As long as it compiles, it's clear the approach still works.

Well then your experience is not really relevant in this thread when the prompt is specifically asking for professional coding work now, is it?

You're not an LLM (at least I don't think you are), you're not obliged to respond with an answer even when that answer is only tangentially related to the prompt.

I'm a full-time software engineer and develop those prototypes as part of my work. Also, I won't respond any further to your comments unless they improve. If you don't like what I'm doing – fine. Just shut up. You don't have to respond to every one of my comments.

I'm also glad I got to experience phpBB message boards, justin.tv and a Facebook that was about friends.

But nowadays you get Discord servers with IS propaganda and twitch.tv is full of prostitutes. Facebook is "the feed", scoured by corporations, full of idealized vacation photos and Russian propaganda.

The old days are not coming back and doing nothing will lead to a further deterioration of the internet landscape.

Get off of FB, Twitch and Discord.

There's still choice. My 6 online friends are on signal and they're 5 real people I interact with irl and 1 guy I never met irl.

Im not on either of these. But letting your kid roam the internet is different from back then. It's like marijuana, which is 100 times strong now than 50 years ago.

That's not the problem this is meant to solve.

You can give your kid a cigarette, a gun, alcohol, heroine and the car keys.

What this enables is to set up a children's account on Linux.

Imagine your kid not being able to click "Im over 18" on a porn site, because Chrome read /etc/age and ratted the children's account out.

Imagine your kid not being able to buy cigarettes easily because it can't pass an ID check at the convenience store.

For most parents, this is actually nice-to-have. For the HN crowd, it's a doomsday scenario full of dictatorial government control.

You shouldn’t dismiss all libertarian points simply because some of them support libertarian agendas. Most HN commenters are fine with your two scenarios, but remember:

1. If kids could download cigarettes by circumventing age checks, would they?

2. If watching porn required obtaining an in-person ID check, other threads have indicated HN accepts it.

OpenTTD now has a totally free asset pack covering everything, it doesn't need the original TTD at all.

"builds on" in concept and by using the same three letters. Not builds on in a legal sense

It’s tricky. It started out by disassembling the commercial binaries. There may not be any original code left, but it’s certainly not a clean room project.

Sorry if that sounds inconsiderate, but I don't feel like changing my communication style just for you. I hope you have a great day.