Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | tjwebbnorfolk's commentslogin

Convincing naive people that you're building AI because you love people is the fastest route to power. You have it backwards. There was never any "arc".

> I don't see how OpenAI employees who have signed the We Will Not Be Divided letter can continue their employment there

um, easy -- everyone has a price. Some of the most highly-paid workers on the planet work there.

Pay me $5M/yr and there are a LOT of things I wouldn't do for $300k.


A stock is ownership in a business, same as ownership in a house. It is an asset that you own.

When you bet on blackjack or the superbowl, you own nothing and are simply wagering on the outcome of an event.

Gambling and equity ownership are not the same.


There's more to stock trading than just "buy and hold". Not all investing has gambling motivations but it is absolutely used as gambling tool by many

You can gamble on literally anything. Stock prices is just one such vehicle.

We've been building canals for thousands of years.

A lot of EVs are heavier than SUVs... but don't let facts get in the way of your crusade.

Instead of assuming bad faith and resorting to insults, simply make the point. EVs can cause road damage too, yes.

I would reply that pound for pound EVs create far fewer issues in other categories than its weight-equivalent ICE vehicle, and that to an extent that weight is justified for the urban environment far more than a 2025 Chevy Duramax.


EVs tend to be about 10% heavier, like for like.

Most EVs are SUVs

So the city can't afford to comply with its own regulations, and instead of fixing the regulation, they find loopholes. I wonder if there's a lesson to be learned, here.

The article says the city claims the biggest issue is federal regulations (the ADA) not city regulations.

My neighborhood in NJ just got those fancy ADA compliant curb ramps last year, along with a repaving. It did take them much longer to install the curb ramps (like a week or two?) than it did to pave (one day) so I can imagine there is a significant cost, even if it's a smaller amount of materials.


One wonders if you could prefabricate kerb ramps and drop them in, rather than (I assume) casting them in place.

Maybe they'd settle badly if vehicles drive over them, kick up in the opposite corners and become a trip hazard.

The UK mostly skirts this by using tarmac and paving slabs instead of concrete.


I don't think there's a way to do this without casting something to connect the pre-fab to the surrounding concrete sidewalk. Like how do you precisely cut out the existing curb so the prefab just fits (including elevation/slope) without excessive gaps or something? And if you're pouring concrete anyway, might as well pour the curb itself.

With prefabs you first dig up both road and sidewalk, set up pre-cut granite curbs (kerbs?) on a mild concrete foundation (negates sinking completely), then repour and repave sidewalk and road. Lasts many years in -20C winters +35C summers climate.

Or make the asphalt "ride up" onto the sidewalk itself, so the complicated part is made of asphalt.

Likely this won't be terribly faster, and I did see the company near us using a machine that was building curb cuts directly.


I looked up kerb cutting machines and it's interesting how much of the process is cutting through cast-in-place kerbs with special saws.

There are hardly any of these in the UK, for example, and kerbs are nearly always made of kerbstones that are sunk into the ground. They have their own problems with sinking when driven on, and I imagine frost heave in areas where the ground freezes seasonally. But it does mean that a dropped kerb installation is quite quick. Most dropped kerbs are simple tarmac ramps rather than concrete castings here.


I wonder if you could just ignore ignore settlement by provisioning for hydraulic slab jacking instead?

Include a built channel for injecting hydraulic grout a few months later once the settlements happened to correct it out.


The ones I saw didn't actually cut the curb - they had arms that held out the form and "built" them in place. I was surprised, as the still-recent but earlier curb cuts had very obvious examples of actual cuts. It was similar to this, perhaps https://www.curbmachines.com

Very few sites are going to be flat or square. I suspect prefabbed parts mostly wouldn't fit without custom adapters around the edges.

Damn. I've been curious what the deal is with the rubber lego knob coverings on sidewalk ramps and here it is. I mostly notice because they're such hell for skateboarding, so it never occurred to me they'd be an ADA thing as I assume they're equally hard to navigate in a wheelchair, but apparently the idea is to provide a tactile warning that the street is nearby for people with vision impairments.

> because they're such hell for skateboarding, so it never occurred to me they'd be an ADA thing as I assume they're equally hard to navigate in a wheelchair

Why do you think so? Even the front wheels of wheelchairs are much larger than those of skateboards, and their main wheels typically are pneumatic (front ones, too, probably, but cheaper ones might skimp on that)


>I mostly notice because they're such hell for skateboarding, so it never occurred to me they'd be an ADA thing

"Be hell for skateboarding" wasn't likely considered a bonus by the disability people because it would rally "those sort of people" to their (otherwise legitimate) cause.


According to the cdc 1 million.people are blind and 7 million people have serious vision impairment.

It would be cheaper to pay 60k a year per blind person to hire them a full time guid for waling outside.


Ok, but curb cuts also positively impact wheelchair users, people with canes or walkers, people with injuries that require crutches or a knee scooter, parents with strollers, people with rolling bags, cyclists, delivery workers and more. They are widely understood to benefit many many people beyond just people with disabilities (so much so that their benefit has given a name to the "curb cut effect").

Also, $60k/year is a) not nearly enough to pay a contractor full time living wage and b) not enough to cover the greater than full time necessary to assist someone. Blind people need to navigate the world at all hours on all days...


Typically taxes need to go up 2x to cover the costs. Most infra projects get done with Fed money because cities can't afford it. Also why home developers build the road and then hand it over to the city for upkeep. Its too expensive.

Because after the home is built, city starts getting tax revenue from its occupants

It can easily afford it.

What the city can't seem to do is rid itself of corrupt employees and corrupt practices.

These people talk a big game, but when it comes to basic office management, they're less than worthless.

I wish I could vote to leave the offices empty. I honestly think that would improve things.


I do wonder if a little part of this is, they talk a big game, get into office and then see the details of full picture and realise they over promised.

It is a nice theory but then they bring out the same rhetoric when seeking re-election. So yeah, corruption may be abound.


Also, they haven't actually done it yet. Announcements are easy. Implementation is hard, and most of them fail.

Wake me up when they actually do it.


I look forward to reading these exact same articles 10 years from now:

"EU contemplating debate over a draft proposal to definitely invest in a consulting contract to study the migration of a part of one agency to a homegrown office suite away from Microsoft"


Ok but this is how the market is supposed to work. If the incumbents aren't doing what their customers want, then competitors can rise and fill the gap and compete.

This isn't a shortcoming, it's a competitive market working as intended.


The market doing what it's supposed to do does not negate that the market segment has only been left open because of overly myopic businesses.

Why would we think businesses will always make the right move?

They'll blunder. They'll do it even harder in the absence of competition.


Who said I thought businesses would always make the right move?

Businesses blunder. "The market" is just a set of observations, including that competitors will tend to take advantage of those blunders. It is not a failure of the market that businesses have blundered, nor surprising that it will happen occasionally, and neither I nor mrweasel implied otherwise.


The market is actively trying to solve it right now. Micron is investing $200B in new fabs. Everyone is trying to ramp up production.

Yes, identifying a problem is easy. But solving shortages in all cases requires perfect knowledge of future demand. So, good luck.


That's what modern capitalism is and it's bad for everyone

Only if you don't want or need any geopolitical gradient at all.

Everyone gets mad when Chinese do capitalism...

NO you see, we have to hate Chinese companies because they are unfair competitors since they get state funding from the Chinese government, unlike Intel, Micron, TSMC, ASML, Samsung who don't get state funding from the US, EU, Taiwan, ROK ... oh wait.

Scratch that, we have to hate Chinese companies because they do business with the Chinese military, unlike Intel, Nvidia, Samsung who don't do business with the US and ROK military ... oh wait.


I know you are being sarcastic but the reason why we have to hate Chinese is simply because the standard of living of Americans depends on China not succeeding, simple as that.

Does it, though? If anything it seems like the opposite: China's success had directly enabled my standard of living as an American to be as high as it is.

I suppose it'd be true that the standard of living of some Americans depends on China not succeeding — specifically, those Americans who own corporations competing with Chinese firms — but I think they'll survive just fine with only 10 yachts instead of 15.


There's maybe a tiny bit more to international economics than who gets a yacht. We know how American lives are, given history. The question you have to ask yourself, is what if Apple had invested $275 billion over 5 years into the US instead of China.

Well then hey can just say THAT, instead of coming up with hypocritical BS that doesn't pass the smell test. People internationally have enough IQ to see through the double standards BS, especially since youtube is a thing.

And the standard of living of working class Americans has been on a steady decline since Reagan by the hand of US administrations, not by the hand of CHina.

This isn't defending anyone's standard of living, it's defending profits of domestic monopolies like Micron, who indulge in state subsidies from US taxpayers and then fuck then over on prices.


You mean neo-mercantilism?

"Why is nobody berating China?" is my favorite oft-repeated refrain on HN.

They’re too busy berating the US.

Lets not forget there is no competitors. There is one competitor- the chinese state, one huge company willing to subsidize any endeavor that will help it fmgain more marketshare with already captured markets.

Now do England, Ireland, Germany, France :)

Exactly! I'm sure most Asian people would fail that test. What a silly thing to measure.

Check the About section. The author is Asian and can’t tell them apart. The website isn’t meant to shame those who can’t do it, it’s to prove they can’t.

https://alllooksame.com/about/


to be fair I'd love such a quizz

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: