See it from another angle: why are you so worked up over the specific limit of 60k? Because you would certainly say just the same thing, had the limit been 65k, 55k or even 30k.
You're practically demanding that the government chooses a limit to specifically include Tesla.
On the continuum of prices for electric vehicles Tesla is one of the (but not the sole) outlier. By choice. Of course chances are high that they will be excluded as long as there is any limit, no matter how that specific limit has been chosen.
Your argument would hold true for 65,000€ or 50,000€ limit too. Why not those limits then? How was the magic number of 65,000€ arrived?
I think you've missed the point again. I'm asking a question on how the 60,000€ number was arrived. If it is not arbitrary, it's fair game. If it isn't, it's a deliberate protectionist move.
Since you can ask that question for every number, it is useless.
Unless you have indications that suggest "a deliberate protectionist move" it's pure polemic.
I have no idea how that specific number was reached. But since I don't suggest ulterior motives or a grand conspiracy I don't have to provide anything. You have to show evidence or at least a coherent argument that amounts to more than "I don't like the outcome".
"Hey Bill, we don't want to subsidize rich people's sports cars, what do you think is a good number for defining a sports car that we don't want to cover?
Uh, I don't know, maybe around 60k gets into the sports car range?"
You are right. 60k is an arbitrary number. Just like 50k and 70k is arbitrary.
But they wanted to have a limit, probably so rich people couldn't use it. So they probably just picked a round number that sounded nice.
You're practically demanding that the government chooses a limit to specifically include Tesla.
On the continuum of prices for electric vehicles Tesla is one of the (but not the sole) outlier. By choice. Of course chances are high that they will be excluded as long as there is any limit, no matter how that specific limit has been chosen.