Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If this gets huge, how will it create net positive number of jobs?


It's not always about growth. Making it easier to meet your needs like this project does, replaces the need for that piece of income/job/growth so is still an economic positive in that way.

This easier path to consumption means the time/effort needed to own these things previously can be redeployed in a productive way.


Ideally I'd guess because people use less money, can make savings, can start companies/other useful activities.


People spending less money isn't good for the economy. It's a component of the downward spiral of recessions.


People spending less money isn't good for the economy.

As long as they spend it on something else like I mentioned it should be ok.


We aren't here to serve the economy.


The point in question was if it would create jobs.


It won't, but who cares? Most of the jobs that go into producing these goods might soon be replaced by AI anyway.

Meanwhile, by setting up a physical store where people pay a fee to "borrow" things, instead of helping them borrow directly from one another for free, a job has been created for whoever works at the store. The obsession with job creation only goes to show that a lot of jobs are inefficiencies waiting to be eliminated.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: