> (a) Does this mean that there will be an sqlite version that can be deployed as a process accessible over network in servers?
No.
> (b) Does this mean that sqlite will now have the capability to do concurrent reads/writes, but that it is upto users to implement a process that can take advantage of this and create something like (a)?
Yes... this allows a multi-threaded application for example to have multiple readers/writers without blocking each other.
No.
> (b) Does this mean that sqlite will now have the capability to do concurrent reads/writes, but that it is upto users to implement a process that can take advantage of this and create something like (a)?
Yes... this allows a multi-threaded application for example to have multiple readers/writers without blocking each other.