Ad hominem attack required because factual statements do not support any of your arguments.
> Whether your gun is more likely to be used against you or in an accident is almost entirely in your power to control.
Well, if your statement is factually correct, then the statistics show that a huge chunk of gun owners are incompetent.
Your statements are not helping your case.
No other statement is required to address yours because it's a naked assertion.
>Well, if your statement is factually correct, then the statistics show that a huge chunk of gun owners are incompetent.
What does that have to do with the safety of my family?
Ad hominem attack required because factual statements do not support any of your arguments.
> Whether your gun is more likely to be used against you or in an accident is almost entirely in your power to control.
Well, if your statement is factually correct, then the statistics show that a huge chunk of gun owners are incompetent.
Your statements are not helping your case.