Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This paper is the basic science.


It is not. The last sentence is utter speculation. I would look into the measurement errors, interference, multiple data points collected by independent monitoring systems, and check for errors against an unbiased/known body of similar mass etcetc. None of this has been done.

It's similar to "my camera spotted this amazing illusory effect and I think it's an artificial body"...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: