Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What bait? I just quoted what other people said. Once upon a time, the Washington Post thought that Apple was notorious for ignoring women’s health issues because they didn’t include a cycle tracker. Now it thinks Apple is anti-competitive for including one. Like I said, you’re damned if you do and you’re damned if you don’t.


Not bait by you, but rather the bait in the way those articles are written.


My mistake. I jumped to a bad conclusion. Your statement made sense in context.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: