Thank you for the context, but I wouldn't defend yourself in this thread: you already have one person narrating your posting history, and another cursing at you (in seeming rage) for not oversharing.
Who would have thought that, on HN of all places, a request for privacy would be interpreted as a license for abuse?
When you claim to have superior knowledge than the medical establishment and allege that there's a "cabal" in opposition to your miracle cure, you cannot expect to be taken seriously while withholding information. That's a very clear "put up or shut up" situation.
Who would have thought that, on HN of all places, a request for privacy would be interpreted as a license for abuse?