This whole scheme is vastly more complex than strictly needed just to make it anonymous.
It takes a bit of motivated reasoning to see this as evidence of bad faith.
Also: this is part of the “missing” exit strategy for social distancing. It doesn’t even make sense in a world in lockdown, because there wouldn’t be any contact data to trace.
I wish people would remember that “slippery slope” is a fallacy as easily as they do with those that support their believes.
There is no full lockdown nearly anywhere you can still go to shops, exercise and go to work if you are a key worker or you do not work in a public facing business.
People over estimate the extent of the lockdown in many countries.
It takes a bit of motivated reasoning to see this as evidence of bad faith.
Also: this is part of the “missing” exit strategy for social distancing. It doesn’t even make sense in a world in lockdown, because there wouldn’t be any contact data to trace.
I wish people would remember that “slippery slope” is a fallacy as easily as they do with those that support their believes.