Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Intel used to have the Quark chip to compete with these embedded ARM cores.


And before that, Intel had XScale ARMs.

Intel decided to leave the low-margin microcontroller business a long time ago. ARM may have gobbled up the market, but there's an entire graveyard of companies who were unable to make it in that highly competitive market.

The Cortex-M world is dominated by peripherals, more so than core performance. A faster or more-accurate 12-bit ADC is what makes your company live or die (or STM's "op-amps on board", which reduce the need of external opamps, a singular opamp + cortex-M3 chip is all you need). Integration is key, not so much performance or even power-efficiency.

--------

In any case, I stand by my primary claim: ARM Cortex-M chips do NOT compete against Intel in any capacity. They're a completely different market. Intel doesn't have the technical expertise needed to make ADCs, Timers, or Op-amps like say, ST-Micro or TI. (Lower-power OpAmps, higher-frequency, lower-input current, lower output impedance, compatibility with a wider variety of voltages from 1V to 5V... etc. etc. ).


They also have the Puma line of DOCSIS cable modem SOCs, but those are kind of infamous right now for some nasty bugs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: