You claim to support private companies adopting whatever moderation policies you want and yet your examples of "hate/conspiracy bullshit" go against this. If you believe this absolutely then _what_ is being censored would be unimportant.
You are unwilling to confront the idea of Twitter censoring true things that you agree with but by your own principles you'd find this agreeable.
I'm sorry if "hate/conspiracy bullshit" was too inflammatory or specific here. I meant it as a stand in for "any content that most would find objectionable." I've edited my post to remove that language. You are correct that I do believe that what is being censored is unimportant.
Please don't presume what I am or am not willing to do.
I am perfectly willing to confront the idea that Twitter is censoring true things that I agree with: it's fine with me. I'm not sure if they're already doing that, but they have every right to, just as I have every right to use (or create) an alternative platform.
You are unwilling to confront the idea of Twitter censoring true things that you agree with but by your own principles you'd find this agreeable.