> And this is what Git does, and hence Git is a blockchain, or works as one, if you prefer.
> To close the circle, let's ask again: Why is Git not considered a “block chain”? It could be because many people, perhaps even a large majority, do not focus on the essence of a concept but on blinking accidents.
I guess, as the question/answer implies, ultimately, it's personal opinion.
I look at Git and other DVCSs implementations and see that they match the definition of blockchain.
> A blockchain is a growing list of records, called blocks, that are securely linked together using cryptography.[1][2][3][4] Each block contains a cryptographic hash of the previous block, a timestamp, and transaction data (generally represented as a Merkle tree, where data nodes are represented by leafs).
