Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This resonates strongly with my experience at Google as well. Specifically in ads, you got the feelings that none of the product leadership used the product or tried to drive a direction for where the product should be going. The end-result was full-on Conway’s law (every team having their own separate pages), weird overlaps between a bunch of things (P-Max, Smart and App campaigns) and no real goals except maximizing metrics such as $$$ and # of campaigns using automation.

Of course, when Google Ads is the only way to buy ads on Google Search, revenue will go up regardless of whether Google Ads is a good product. Advertiser will go through any hoops if those ads make them money.

But then revenue goes up, the leadership pats themselves on the back for a job well done, plays musical chair a bit and let the product turn into an even bigger pile of mush.



It must be a different eponymous law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law


Hah, my bad. I meant Conways’ law




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: