Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Erm. So you believe the only difference between women and men is their genitalia? What planet are you from? You've never seen any evidence of their thought processes being different, their completely different logic, social skills, spacial awareness etc?

I'm sorry but if you believe that you're blind, or really haven't lived.

Your statement sums up what is wrong with the political correctness/equality mob. Men and women are not equal. They will never be. Thank goodness. Celebrate the differences. Embrace them. Don't just blindly pretend they don't exist.



You were asked for evidence for an assertion you made that boys behave worse in classes with female teachers, and that girls behave worse in classes with male teachers. Put up or shut up, axod.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14546994/?GT1=8404

http://www.menteach.org/news/its_not_who_but_how_boys_are_ta...

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/boys-taught-men-do-better-stu...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/sep/30/primaryschoo...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/5294854.stm

"A study of 25,000 pupils by Stanford University economist Thomas Dee found children did 4% better in tests when their teachers were of the same sex"

"In general, girls learned more with female teachers and boys with male teachers"

"A large fraction of boys' dramatic underperformance in reading is linked to the fact that their reading teachers are overwhelmingly female," Dee concludes.

There are a large number of similar studies with similar results.


Think you might be able to do better than one "controversial" study published by the conservative Hoover Institution by a visiting Swarthmore associate professor, an unpublished survey taken by a private consultancy in the UK, and an opinion poll in the UK?


Well, you seem to want to believe women and men are exactly the same, so you go on believing that.

My experience, including my kids experience of various teachers, is that they are not.

Of course it's a "controversial" study - it highlights differences between the sexes. Which isn't "cool" in this politically correct age.


That's not an argument; it's just circumstantial ad hominem. I could advance my argument against you the same way by saying you sound awfully threatened by women and gay people.

The claim you're citing is surprising not only because it defies conventional wisdom (which it does), but also implies that whole of the American educational system is built on an easily-corrected inefficiency. Why can't you marshall better evidence for your extraordinary claim? Why don't you have a better source than an untenured Swarthmore professor writing in a journal with dubious peer review?


Are you conceding or just ignoring axod's point that men and women are different in more ways than anatomical?


When you or axod give me a relevant significant non-physical way that men and women are different, I'll address it. I chose to address the specific, relevant, wrong point he offered as an alternative.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: