Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why do you assume everyone is talking about GPT4? Why do you assume we haven't tried all possibilities? Also, I was talking about Facebook's moderation AI, not GPT4, I have yet to see real concrete evidence that GPT4 can detect a joke that hasn't been said before. It's really really good at classification but so far there are some gaps in comprehension.


> I was talking about Facebook's moderation AI, not GPT4

No you weren't. You were making a categorical claim about the capabilities of AI in general:

> bots/AI can’t comprehend sarcasm, jokes, or otherwise human behaviors


Notice how bots and AI are lumped, that’s called a classification. I was referring to bot/AI not pre-cognitive AI or GenAI. AI is a broad term, hence the focus on bot/AI. I guess it would make more sense if it was written bot/ML?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: