Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Would also like to see a ban on firmware updates and programming tools locked behind a dealer (or support contract) portal and a ban on time-restricted software licenses for hardware.

Won't happen. Feds find the status quo too useful to let every tom dick and harry start wrenching on these things

I'm pretty familiar with what's going on at CAT. A large part of the way all the emissions stuff that everyone (I'm talking about the customers, dealers, OEMs, the people who actually pay for things, not the online peanut gallery) hates gets enforced is that the OEM threatens the dealers that they'll cut them off from the software if they don't run a tight ship and their techs are too frequently caught doing things like plugging into vehicles outside the scope of their job, working on deleted equipment and whatnot. The dealers roll this downhill to their employees. I assume Deere is similar.

Basically removing the dealers and therefore the OEM's stranglehold on software would take the teeth out of emissions enforcement.



In a world where rolling coal[1] is a thing that people do voluntarily, I submit that emissions enforcement (as it stands) is a failed experiment. It's time to rethink it from first principles.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolling_coal


> Basically removing the dealers and therefore the OEM's stranglehold on software would take the teeth out of emissions enforcement.

I don't buy that. This strangehold is the only way that VW managed to cheat emissions for years without getting caught.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: