… it would simply make up confident answers. Dunno if you've used Google recently, but it will very confidently provide simply useless search results, pages and pages and pages of useless search results.
I look at using LLMs as like using another programming language. My C++ skills are not going to be directly useful in Rust or OCaml. I need to learn a new paradigm.
I'd ask AI the same questions. This is the crux. You really have to learn how to write (engineer) good prompts and you have to check what the LLM wrote. You use 'confidently' as a disparaging word. I think LLMs clear writing is quite useful in the reduction phase.
LLMs are perfect? No, just way better than Google.
To organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful has become To serve an ad and call it a day.
> it will very confidently provide simply useless search results, pages and pages and pages of useless search results.
I had assumed that this degredation of search with useless results was an attempt to drive more people towards its even more useless AI products/results.
… it would simply make up confident answers. Dunno if you've used Google recently, but it will very confidently provide simply useless search results, pages and pages and pages of useless search results.
I look at using LLMs as like using another programming language. My C++ skills are not going to be directly useful in Rust or OCaml. I need to learn a new paradigm.
I'd ask AI the same questions. This is the crux. You really have to learn how to write (engineer) good prompts and you have to check what the LLM wrote. You use 'confidently' as a disparaging word. I think LLMs clear writing is quite useful in the reduction phase.
LLMs are perfect? No, just way better than Google.
To organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful has become To serve an ad and call it a day.