>> they give incorrect but plausible answers about 5-10% of the time.
This describes most of the human population as well. Why do we expect machines to be more accurate and perfect in their correctness than humans before we say they are at parity, when they are clearly savant as much as idiot. It’s a strange bias.
This describes most of the human population as well. Why do we expect machines to be more accurate and perfect in their correctness than humans before we say they are at parity, when they are clearly savant as much as idiot. It’s a strange bias.