Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's one capability that was lost with the space shuttle. There's nothing remaining nor planned that can bring something that size back from LEO.

I feel like materials science could learn a lot more about radiation embrittlement and high energy micro impacts.

The space shuttle is often regarded as a huge mistake and in many ways (reusability especially, it was more like rebuildability :) ) it was, but it was still hell of a machine.



> That's one capability that was lost with the space shuttle. There's nothing remaining nor planned that can bring something that size back from LEO.

Surely the X-37 could be used to bring a satellite down, even if it's not an acknowledged capability?


The X-37 is tiny, it’s only 5 tonnes itself. But one of the uses is probably to bring back smaller satellites to determine how long term exposure in space has affected them.


only a very tiny one at most


I feel like materials science could learn a lot more about radiation embrittlement and high energy micro impacts.

They do those experiments on the ISS: https://www.nasa.gov/materials-international-space-station-e...


Starship might be capable, once it gets the "chomper" cargo bay. Would require custom hardware though.


Yeah the cool thing about the shuttle is that it also was a mini space station. Astronauts could actually live in it for a while. Which came in handy building the ISS I'm sure. Robotics weren't what they are now so it was a lot of hand work.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: