Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are you saying controversial is good or bad?


Neither, that's up to your individual preference. Although I think that controversial threads have more noise, but sometimes provide a more enjoyable read.


So what use is it to filter them? It seems you still have to judge their worth based on their actual contents.


The front page has an algorithm that is "less noise, more news" but if you go to the /active page, you get more conversation-driven submissions. I tend to load both up and refresh every few hours.


> The FAQ notes that submission rank is impacted by "software which downweights overheated discussions." A good rule of thumb for this effect is when the number of comments on a submission exceeds its score. Moderators can overrule the downranking for appropriate, not-actually-a-flame-war discussions.

https://github.com/minimaxir/hacker-news-undocumented


Consider there are 100 upvotes and 100 downvotes. Net votes: 0. The submission would end up with a lower ranking that you wanted it to have.


Submissions don’t have downvotes, only flagging.


Fair. But it still holds for the comments section.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: