> I don't understand how anyone can rationalize this bill in the face of what OpenAI just agreed to with the DoD.

NY doesn’t have any obligation to agree with the DoD. Also the applications seems quite different, although I don’t think AI should actually be relied on for either one!

> Wouldn't this also violate the "no state my limit or restrict the use of AI" that the current administration is pushing?

No, it doesn’t violate it. States can’t violate executive orders, because executive orders aren’t instructions for the states. The instructions are for the executive branch, for example, if this becomes law the US Attorney General will try to find some way to fight against it.

I did not understand this, thank you for clarifying.

> I don't understand how anyone can rationalize this bill in the face of what OpenAI just agreed to with the DoD.

> AI can surveil and direct munitions but it cant answer legal questions.

There's no contradiction. The people sponsoring this bill don't think that AI should be used for either of those purposes.

Understood, I was under the impression that they were supporting this use and opposed to the DoD usage. Thank you for the clarification.