Pointless and deceptive. A real "right to compute" law would ban remote attestation, would ban discrimination against users based on the "trustworthiness" of their systems, would force companies to allow custom software and firmware as well as provide technical documentation and specifications to users so they can repair and modify the systems they bought.
You have the right to not provide custom software and firmware and technical documentation, the right to enforce remote attestation, and the right to refuse service to whoever you wish.
> Just like all food sellers have the right not to provide documentation on the ingredients and nutrition of their products?
I agree that they should have this right. My personal anecdote explains that the citizens of other countries do have this right without the world falling apart.
> Just like all food sellers have the right not to provide documentation on the ingredients and nutrition of their products?
I agree that they should have this right. My personal anecdote explains that the citizens of other countries do have this right without the world falling apart.
Your right to do all that should be taken away. Our freedom to own our computers is more important than your right to punish us for trying to do so by banishing us from digital society via remote attestation. Your only option should be to accept that we own our computers and deal with us on those terms. Refusing to do so should be criminalized on the same level as racism.
Disagree, sometimes you'll see real people on this website advocating for racism to be illegal. It wouldn't surprise me at all if that's what they truly meant.
