>Then you're not adding anything to the discussion.
Nonsense and this is a cheap way to try and manipulate me into satisfying your curiosity.
The fact is, my statement probably applies to most (all?) of them in some form or another. As written I'm sure some people will assume I mean someone they know some dirt on and others would pick someone else.
The whole " still don't know what he did" is exactly the kind of politics I wanted to avoid while making my point as anything I would point to in my example is likely to draw out apologists and start a big fight about "what is evil anyway?". Exactly the kind of thing this site doesn't need.
And in any case I was probably specific enough for most to correctly guess who I was thinking of, as it is.
Nonsense and this is a cheap way to try and manipulate me into satisfying your curiosity.
The fact is, my statement probably applies to most (all?) of them in some form or another. As written I'm sure some people will assume I mean someone they know some dirt on and others would pick someone else.
The whole " still don't know what he did" is exactly the kind of politics I wanted to avoid while making my point as anything I would point to in my example is likely to draw out apologists and start a big fight about "what is evil anyway?". Exactly the kind of thing this site doesn't need.
And in any case I was probably specific enough for most to correctly guess who I was thinking of, as it is.