Interesting. I was about to impulse-comment on a previous comment, but then say yours.
Makes me wonder about the ways of being wrong, and who do people here think tend to be wrong in a good or valuable way?
E.g., making conjectures that at least posit novel interaction of events and ideas, or are wrong due to lack of current knowledge and over-optimistic conjecture, not because of willful ignorance or bias.
(I suppose that describes any good sci-fi writer; I'm thinking more of bloggers or essayists.)
Makes me wonder about the ways of being wrong, and who do people here think tend to be wrong in a good or valuable way?
E.g., making conjectures that at least posit novel interaction of events and ideas, or are wrong due to lack of current knowledge and over-optimistic conjecture, not because of willful ignorance or bias.
(I suppose that describes any good sci-fi writer; I'm thinking more of bloggers or essayists.)