Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> NGINX doesn't differentiate enough from the other HTTP servers out there to justify the cost.

Then why the angst? This just makes me more confused about what your argument is.



What angst? That post reads more like a warning to others to me - after all, if they'd been aware of this issue from the start, they could've just used Apache from the beginning and avoided the hassle of having to migrate.


It's a sad reason to have to drop a piece of software and learn the config management of another. logging, really?

Perhaps in the next version it will be free for up to 20 concurrent connections and then $1 for each one after that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: