Nobody looked before, really? Speculation about "who is Satoshi Nakamoto" has been around for years now, except previous Satoshi-s weren't called that and were suspected based on their deeds in field of cryptography. Wikipedia [1] mentions 6 of them and I've heard of more.
And "journalism" (professional one) usually makes me suspect making up random stuff much more than anything else. They are paid to make scandalous articles, you know.
To be fair, I don't personally claim it is fake. I say it is weird and makes me easily accept someone claiming it is fake.
And "journalism" (professional one) usually makes me suspect making up random stuff much more than anything else. They are paid to make scandalous articles, you know.
To be fair, I don't personally claim it is fake. I say it is weird and makes me easily accept someone claiming it is fake.
[1] - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Nakamoto