Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

My understanding is that Japan hasn't been to successful in space launch, which also happens to be the main delivery mechanism.



For those that can't be bothered:

"The success rate of 95% of the H-2A is on a par with 96.4 percent for the Atlas V of the United States and 94.9 percent for the European Ariane 5"


H-2A is a liquid rocket that is very large, uses finicky cryogenic fuels and takes many days to prepare for launch.

The much smaller Japanese Mu series is a solid space launcher and provides a much better technology base for missiles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_%28rocket%29


Apparently I was wrong, I stand corrected.

Here's a list of various Japanese launch systems and their success rates.

System - success - fail - percent success

- Epsilon - 1 - 1 - 100%

- GX - 0 - 0 - (abandoned)

- H-1 - 9 - 9 - 100%

- H-2 - 5 - 1 - 80% (or 60%, one of the successes was a partial failure)

- H-IIA - 23 - 1 - 95.7%

- H-IIB - 4 - 4 - 100%

- J-I - 1 - 1 - 100% (then abandoned)

- Lambda 4 - 9 - 5 - 44%

- Lambda 4S - 5 - 4 - 20%

- M-V - 7 - 1 - 85%

- N-I - 7 - 1 - 85%

- N-II - 8 - 0 - 100%




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: