I find it interesting that you have chosen to take one comment from one person, question his ability to represent an entire professional community, yet in the very next breath use that same person to define an entire group as morally bankrupt.
Oh, I don't question his ability to represent the community at all. Maybe I should re-write that sentence to remove any ambiguity? I think he's a fine specimen, quite representative judging by the offers I get from him and his colleagues.
