Automating these aspects of legal practice wouldn't disrupt the way that industry functions. It would just make a lot of paralegals and young lawyers obsolete (and make legal services a lot cheaper).
Thank you for pointing this out. I get annoyed when people use the term "disrupt" improperly. A true disruption, in the sense that Clayton Christensen used it, would be a cheaper but poorer AI replacement for lawyers.
Automating these aspects of legal practice wouldn't disrupt the way that industry functions. It would just make a lot of paralegals and young lawyers obsolete (and make legal services a lot cheaper).